I needed help. What I got was a chatbot.

-

It started the same way it always does. I had an issue with a service, so I did what any reasonable person would do: I searched for an answer myself. I combed through the FAQ, clicked on links, skimmed through articles. No luck. Alright, time to contact support. That’s when my eyes focused on the chatbot icon. Maybe, I thought, it would be helpful. Maybe it would get me to a real person.

Spoiler: It did not. Instead, it put me through a maze of automated responses, serving up the same FAQ pages I had already checked. Every attempt to get real help circled me back to square one. Finding an actual human? I probably would have more success winning the lottery.

The Rise of Chatbots in Customer Service

Chatbots weren’t always this...unhelpful. In fact, they started with promise. The earliest chatbot, ELIZA, was developed in the 1960s at MIT. It mimicked a psychotherapist, responding with simple rephrasings of user input. Revolutionary at the time, though in hindsight, it was about as helpful as texting a friend who only replies with “That’s interesting, tell me more.”

Fast forward to the 1990s, and chatbots like A.L.I.C.E. started experimenting with more advanced pattern recognition. Still, they lacked true conversational intelligence. Then came the 2010s—Siri, Alexa, Google Assistant—AI-driven chatbots that could process natural language and actually do useful things. Businesses saw an opportunity. Chatbots became the front line of customer service, promising efficiency, 24/7 availability, and of course lower costs than their human counterparts in outsourced overseas call centers.

The problem? Not all chatbots got the memo. While some advanced bots can genuinely assist customers, many companies implement bare-minimum, FAQ-regurgitating bots that do little more than give you the digital equivalent of a shrug.

The Expectation vs. Reality Trap

Seeing a chatbot icon suggests interactivity. Customers assume they’ll get real help, either from a capable AI or a human behind the scenes. Instead, they get an FAQ search engine with a chat window. This bait-and-switch creates two major problems:

  1. It wastes time. Clicking through a well-structured FAQ is far faster than typing questions into a chatbot that will inevitably link back to the same articles.

  2. It frustrates customers. Instead of feeling supported, users feel like they’re trying to outsmart an automated bouncer who won’t let them into the “talk to a real person” club.

Why Basic Support Tools Often Work Better

If a chatbot exists solely to act as a middleman between customers and static information, it’s not just redundant—it actively complicates support. Here’s why simple, well-designed alternatives are often superior:

  • Clear navigation beats a guessing game: A well-structured help center, with an intuitive layout and search function, allows customers to locate answers quickly—without having to type the right magic phrase into a chatbot.

  • Direct access to support options: Instead of being led in circles by a chatbot that refuses to acknowledge the need for a human, a transparent support page clearly lists contact options like email, phone, or live chat.

  • More control over the experience: Customers want to choose how they get help. A knowledge base, community forums, and even a simple “contact us” form allow them to access the right level of support without artificial roadblocks.

When Chatbots Actually Work

Not all chatbots are bad. When done right, they provide real value. Here’s when they shine:

  • Live chat escalation: A chatbot that quickly connects customers to a human when needed is a win.

  • Context-aware responses: If the bot can actually understand user intent and provide direct answers rather than just linking to generic pages, it’s useful.

  • Task automation: Resetting passwords, processing refunds, booking appointments—these are areas where chatbots can genuinely help.

The Illusion of Support is Worse Than No Support

Some companies think adding a chatbot makes their customer service better. But if that chatbot is just a dressed-up FAQ, it does more harm than good. It gives the illusion of support without delivering actual help.

If your business is using a chatbot, ask yourself: Is this actually making things easier for customers, or is it just a cost-cutting tool disguised as support? If it’s the latter, it’s time to rethink the approach. A frustrating chatbot damages trust more than a simple, well-organized FAQ page ever could.

A truly effective chatbot should enhance customer experience, not hinder it. If that’s not achievable, a well-designed help center with straightforward navigation and real human support when needed can often be the best solution. After all, great support isn’t about flashy technology—it’s about making it easy for customers to get the help they need.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First runs in 2024: Done.

-
Image
The first two races of the year are in the books. Last week, I hit the road locally amidst a summery 25°C. Thankfully, I opted for the 7k instead of a longer distance. The day before, I scouted the route on my bike and was surprised by the steep incline at the start of the run. It was in the back of my mind the whole time, but seeing it and experiencing it on my bike, that was something different. I had registered for this race in 2023 but sat it out, feeling underprepared. Judging by the state of my legs after those 7k, it was definitely the right call. Today marked the second race in Munich: a 10k. The lead-up was marked by colder, wetter, and gloomier weather. Conditions that would test anyone's resolve on a training run at home. Yet, with the race looming, my mindset was clear: I'd paid for it, so I was going to try to run it. For 9.8km, Munich's weather showcased its milder side, albeit still 20°C cooler than the week before, with a brisk wind. Nevertheless, patches of...
Read more

Journey to Japan: Settling in

-
Image
Day 2 After the whirlwind of yesterday, travelling to Frankfurt, transiting in China and finally arriving in Japan, navigating the unfamiliar, dealing with missing luggage, and adjusting to this long-anticipated trip suddenly becoming real, Day 2 started more slowly. I let myself sleep in a bit longer and enjoyed a proper hotel breakfast. The calm after the storm. The first mission of the day: get local IC cards, those magical tap-and-go passes that make life on Japanese trains and buses so much easier. I started at the ticket machines, scanning the screens, hoping to get what I wanted, but I didn't. So I braced myself and headed over to the Travel Service Center. Time to practice some of the very few Japanese words that I knew. Took a waiting number, and queued with my phone ready, translation app open. Thankfully, it was all smooth and efficient. Within minutes, I had the cards. With that task done, I exited the station and started walking toward the stadium to pick up my race st...
Read more

Journey to Japan: Raceday

-
Image
Day 3 Waking up a bit early, slightly restless night due to a mix of anticipation and nervousness. For the past week, I didn’t run at all and I wasn’t sure how well my legs were feeling now. Skipping breakfast at the hotel, I almost certainly would have eaten to much of the wrong things there, I had a couple of oatmeal bars from home, topped up with Onigiris from the trainstation. Already walking to the trainstation, we started to see more and more runners and once being on the train to the stadium, there were a lot of us runners. After having a bit of a look around, there was not enough time for a proper warmup, so as usual, the first kilometers would have to stand in for that after all. At this point, running a halfmarathon is for me still much more about being able to finish the run and less about improving my times. Also this half marathon had a much shorter cutoff time than my previous ones at about 2.5 hrs. Having a look around, I also started to realize that this running event w...
Read more